🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.